Saturday, December 24, 2011

Normal Family?



“Normal” seems to be a moving target when discussing the family. Walsh claims that “normal” is not usable category when trying to describe the family and that family should be defined more in terms of markers present. 

I believe that cultural shifting probably plays some role in what most people consider a normal family. The basic Christian belief that all humans are created in the image of God, and therefore equally valuable before God, should be the mantra that equalizes the differences between. However, societal/cultural shifting concerning the value and dignity of human life has contributed to the diminishing role of this Christian belief. Culture has shifted to more of a comparative view of people, and when we compare ourselves to each other we soon find that no family is “normal.”

The thought process behind comparing, whether we understand it or not, views people more in terms of worthiness, honor, success, and just about any other attribute we might inject into the comparison.
I’m off the soap-box now.

Assessing normality seems to be a very arduous task. Do we base our evaluation of a family on sociological, psychological, or biological factors? What I have learned is that to properly evaluate a family one must include all of the above to varying degrees. From a secular point of view, families need to be groups that provide for the basic needs of the members of the group such as food, money, shelter, psychological support, and problem solving. 

However, I might offer a few thoughts about what constitutes a “normal” family. I would suggest the idea that normal families can have some minor problems and even major problems although these should be few. “Normal” families can have communication problems, and they often will. The reason, I suggest, is that although God created everything and called it “Good.” Man (and woman) fell into sin, and therefore no matter how perfect a family may seem, there will never be a perfect family situation. We are not capable of normal. So, how do I define “normal?” “Normal” is the family that amidst all of life’s struggles, including social, psychological, and biological, strive to maintain God’s original design for the family (two people helping one another, loving one another, and serving those around them). This is how they show Christ-like behavior toward those within the family group, and to those outside the family group.

Do you think that trying to maintain a "traditional family" makes it a "normal family"? 

If so, why?
T

THEOLOGY OF THE FAMILY


God performed the first marriage ceremony in the Garden of Eden. God Himself said, “For this reason a man shall leave his father and his mother, and be joined to his wife; and they shall become one flesh” (Genesis 2:24, NASB). We find marriage referred to, or defined as, a “covenant” in Malachi 2:14. These two references are the basis for the first and most important ingredient in the design of the family, the marriage of two individuals into one family. A very important point to remember is that the institution of marriage was set up by God before the Fall of man, and it is considered part of God’s original creation. It is not a man-made institution. It is equally as important to remember that marriage is used throughout the New Testament as a picture of Jesus and His followers. It is also a profound reference to Jesus’ return, “But at midnight there was a shout, ‘Behold, the bridegroom! Come out to meet him” (Matt. 25:6, NASB). How does all of this fit into the realm of psychology in general, and specifically why is it important to the Christian counselor? The answer to these questions can be found in this one simple, yet profound statement, “Then the LORD God said, “It is not good for the man to be alone” (Genesis 2:18, NASB). If this statement is true, and I believe that it is true, the Biblical family structure is a key, if not the key, to healthy relationships on all levels.

What is a Christian Family?

The purpose of the family is primarily made up of three components. The first is relationships. Francis Schaeffer describes the relationships of a Christian this way,
“A Christian’s first call is to step from the line of Cain into the line of Abel, upon the basis of the shed blood of the Lamb of God, to return to the first commandment to love God, to love the brotherhood, and then to love one’s neighbor as himself” (Schaeffer, 1972).
Relationships form the foundation for a Christian family. There is an order to those relationships as well. If we do not get the order right, none of the relations will work in accordance to God’s plan for the family. This is why it is important to help people realize that to even begin to get one’s life on the right path; we must have a proper view of who God is, and what our relationship with Him should look like. Only then can we be in right relationships with family, friends, and others outside our immediate circles.
Nurture is the second component of a Christian family. The family should help one another along the road of life. Children need parents to provide for their basic needs of food, clothing, and shelter. Older adults need their grown children to help care for them, and to return the care once provided to them. One of the greatest explanations of what nurture looks like from a Christian perspective is found in 21 Days to a Great Marriage by Cloud and Townsend. In this book the word nudge can be used interchangeably with nurture,
“We all need nudges in our marriages. Nudges have to do with seeing that each of you can be more than you are and helping each other on that path. They have to do with our expectations of each other. You are to love each other enough to expect your partner to grow into more than he/she is right now” (Cloud & Townsend, 2006).
A Christian family is one that nurtures each other to grow. To grow physically healthy, mentally stronger and learned, and socially relatable. When relationships are right and nurturing within the family is right, supporting one another through times of trial becomes possible.
Support is the third component of the Christian family. Our example of support as Christians should come from the life of Jesus Christ. Jesus had much to say about helping others. The story of the Good Samaritan is a great illustration of what true support looks like. When a family member has a problem, the other members are there to support that member. Support can mean many things. It can mean an ear to listen, words of advice, help in seeking medical care, help with material needs, and the list could go on and on. The Christian family will support each other because they love one another. The writer of Hebrews paints an outstanding picture of why families can support each other. We do not have Jesus as an example of someone that does not know our pain and suffering. We have a savior that has been in the trenches of life with us, and expects us to live like He lived and help others in the same way He helps us, “For we do not have a high priest who cannot sympathize with our weaknesses, but One who has been tempted in all things as we are, yet without sin. Therefore let us draw near with confidence to the throne of grace, so that we may receive mercy and find grace to help in time of need” (Hebrews 4:15-16).

Biblical Perspective

The Old Testament picture of the family focused on the earthly father at the ex-facto head of the household and everything else family related. The Old Testament family included the immediate family, animals owned, friends, and even visiting strangers.
However, the New Testament pictures the family with a focus on the Heavenly Father. The New Testament family is built on love, “Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ also loved the church and gave Himself up for her” (Ephesians 5:25, NASB). It is built on love between one man and one woman, “But from the beginning of creation, God MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE. FOR THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH; so they are no longer two, but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate” (Mark 10:6-9, NASB). And once united, the marital relationship is permanent, “And He said to them, ‘Whoever divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery against her; and if she herself divorces her husband and marries another man, she is committing adultery” (Mark 10:11-12, NASB). This permanency is also reiterated in Luke 16:18.
There should also be a mutual sharing in family relationships. The imperative to share is so ingrained into the family that the Bible tells us that even our bodies are not our own to withhold from our spouse (1 Corinthians 7:4).
Children are also important to the Christian family. Bearing children is a way for believers to become co-creators by helping earthly children become children of God, “it is not the children of the flesh who are children of God, but the children of the promise are regarded as descendants” (Romans 9:8, NASB). This is an awesome responsibility, but equally an awesome privilege. With great privilege comes great responsibility.
Discipline must be included within the Christian family. Discipline is not just something an adult administers; it is a matter of life and death,
“Children, obey your parents in the Lord, for this is right. HONOR YOUR FATHER AND MOTHER (which is the first commandment with a promise), SO THAT IT MAY BE WELL WITH YOU, AND THAT YOU MAY LIVE LONG ON THE EARTH. Fathers, do not provoke your children to anger, but bring them up in the discipline and instruction of the Lord” (Ephesians 6:1-4).
However, discipline within the home as it pertains to children is not an option. Being a friend to your child seems to be the mantra of the day, but that is the world’s way of child-rearing. The Bible instructs Christians to discipline children while they are young, “Discipline your son while there is hope” (Proverbs 19:18, NASB). Proverbs 12 tells us that if we shun discipline we are “stupid.” That is what the scripture says, we are “stupid” if we do not love discipline. Love here does not mean to take delight in, but because of the love we have we want better for our children or even ourselves. Dr. James Dobson writes that there is a critical period in a child’s life where discipline is very effective, and specifically effective as it relates to God. He says, “Their concepts of right and wrong,…are formulated during this time, and their view of God begins to solidify” (Dobson, Dare to Discipline, 1973). How important it is to raise a child in a Christian family. Leaving children to their own devices during their formative years can contribute to improper understandings of right and wrong as adults.
There is a commitment to the family that is paramount to wellbeing of those within the family. Christians are commanded to commit to one another. This command encompasses those in the immediate family and those within the larger community of faith, “So then, while we have opportunity, let us do good to all people, and especially to those who are of the household of the faith” (Galatians 6:10, NASB). Christians should bear one another’s burdens, and within the family bearing each other’s burdens can be the glue that holds a family together through trial upon trial.

Culture’s Influence on the Church

Propaganda is the key that starts the car of doubt which can race around in circles in our mind. Sam Roberts, of the New York Times, said, “married couples, as a proportion of American households are declining, and are now in the minority” (Roberts, 2006). That sounds terrible at first glance, but a deeper understanding of the details reveals a very skewed and manipulated study that would not be worthy of any first year college student. Roberts wasn’t concerned with the accuracy of the numbers, he just wanted to make a point. Why would he put out something so blatantly wrong? Two words, The Fall.
Since the fall of man we have wanted to get as far removed from God as possible. It is our sin nature, and it is that simple. A Christian waiting in the doctor’s office might have read this article and think “I guess all is lost for traditional marriage,” but how wrong they would have been. If only they had all the facts. The dominant culture wants to re-define everything. So it is no wonder that marriage and the family are under attack. With the rate of divorce in the church keeping pace with the rate among non-believers, or in some cases surpassing them, do we really think the church is having influence over the culture?
People are marrying later, marrying less, and divorcing more. There is a prevailing idea within society that marriage is optional. The media and entertainment businesses glorify living together out of wedlock as not just an alternative, but a preferable way to live. At this rate the family, as an institution created by God, could be in big trouble. In 2000 the U.S. Census estimated about 10 million people in America live with someone of the opposite sex, and even worse 1.2 million live with same-sex partners (Census, 2000). Current trends should be cause for concern because the trendier life-styles include replacing marriage with cohabitation, accepting divorce as a convenient way to resolve petty problems without concern for the children that might be involved. Then there is the problem of people having children out of wedlock. This seems to be happening more and more, and could be a symptom of a deeper issue. There seems to be a growing disconnect between having children and getting married. Then we have the church lamenting that they should be non-judgmental, open arms to all without accountability for any. This is seen in no more powerful way than through the attack on the family. Dr. James Dobson lays the foundation to help understand how the church has lost its influence, “One of the earliest and most damaging blows came in 1969, when the world’s first no-fault divorce law…was signed into law in California. With a stroke of the pen ‘till death do us part’ became optional” (Dobson, Marriage Under Fire, 2004). As if this was not bad enough, same-sex couples have become the “norm” in some states. How does the church respond to the newest threat to the family? Again, I admire the words of Dr. Dobson,
“we are obligated as Christians to treat homosexuals respectfully and with dignity, but we are also to oppose, with all vigor, the radical changes they hope to impose on the nation. It is vitally important that we do so” (Dobson, Marriage Under Fire, 2004).

Christian Counseling and the Family
Like all created things, marriage and the family should glorify God. They should be a reflection of His holiness and his grace. “That is they exist to magnify the truth and worth and beauty and greatness of God” (Grudem, 2002). We are created for God’s glory, and this fact forms the basic building blocks for my beliefs concerning family therapy. God Speaks through the prophet Isaiah and says this regarding Israel (though it applies to all), “Bring My sons from afar And My daughters from the ends of the earth, Everyone who is called by My name, And whom I have created for My glory” (Isaiah 43:6b-7, NASB). The key words here are “My glory.” We are to be the glory of God for others. God is the starting point for all things. Everything that exists is a result of our creative God.
“That is the starting place for understanding marriage. If we get this wrong, everything goes wrong. And if we get it right – really right, in our heads and in our hearts – then marriage will be transformed by it” (Grudem, 2002).

The Counselor
From a counseling perspective, I believe the starting point for building a relationship is helping the person I sit across from understand that they are created in the image of God. I believe there is a need for that person to have a grasp, although sometimes loosely in the beginning, on this fact. It is foundational to the way I approach counseling. Christian counseling without the integration of the scriptures is not Christian at all. Historically, many people have sought out the priest, pastor, or preacher whenever they have needed some to talk to that could help them with whatever situation they were dealing with at the time. Those people were more than likely taken to the scriptures in order to help them understand their given situation within the context of what God expects from them, and what He will do for them as well. A problem is “understood only as it is evaluated Biblically” (Adams, 1976). The potential for positive impact using this type of approach is immense. Why? The potential is great because “Christian psychology is one that is faithful to reality” (Myers, 2003). For Christian counseling to have any chance for success in the future, it must reflect the truth of reality. The Bible offers a very real look into the mirror of life. What is says about any given topic corresponds to reality. The explanations are not always as exhaustive as one would like, but they are thorough enough to bring understanding to a given topic. As far as counseling goes, one need only look to this passage from the Apostle Paul for confirmation about the use of scripture within counseling,
“For whatever was written in earlier times was written for our instruction, so that through perseverance and the encouragement of the Scriptures we might have hope” (Romans 15:4, NASB).
The words of Paul give encouragement that no matter how far away from God the secular counseling world goes, we can have refuge in knowing that His word is sufficient, and that through using it we can teach and encourage others.

The Battle Ahead
Christians must allow Scripture to be the lens through which they not only view psychology, but it must become the lens through which they see everything in the world. With this in mind, reading and understanding the discoveries of secular psychology should never be omitted from the process of understanding the field as a whole. The main thought to keep in mind however is to always filter those readings through Scripture. So many times the temptation is there to find a theory, approach, or a method one might like and then search out verses to reinforce their preferences. This is reminiscent of how J.Vernon McGee used to define liberalism, “the pulpit trying to make the unsaved church member happy” (McGee). Eric Johnson, in Foundations for Soul Care, does not suggest that Christians engaged in counseling should only study the Bible, but they must have a Biblical template (or lens) that allows them to study secular psychology with the aim to glorify God through their practice.

Where Do We Go
As I have studied psychology, and watched how many Christian universities have begun programs to be more active in teaching people from a Christian point-of-view it gives some hope for the future of counseling. The passé styles of the 1960’s and 1970’s seem to be fading as more Christians become involved in counseling. Avoiding a synthesis of secular and Christian views will always be the key to advancing a proper understanding of Christian based counseling. No matter if one likes the Rogerian idea that we can help ourselves, which is entirely anti-scriptural, or Jung’s ideas of archetypes we must always remember that it is integration (how behavior fits into scripture, and how scripture responds) and not synthesis (or a blending of secular and sacred ideas) that will truly help people. We need to work on helping people understand what a Biblical model of the family looks like.

End Where We Began
Relationships are important to God. In Genesis God brought the family into existence. Jesus has provided an example of Godly behavior. He has given us something to compare our live to, “Now may the God who gives perseverance and encouragement grant you to be of the same mind with one another according to Christ Jesus” (Romans 15:5, NASB).

The Process
When problems arise within the family there are Biblical answers to resolve them. We are to forgive others as God has forgiven us. The world might say “just forget them,” but the Bible says, “Be kind to one another, tender-hearted, forgiving each other, just as God in Christ also has forgiven you” (Ephesians 4:32, NASB). The world says we are to love ourselves, but the Bible says we are to love one another sacrificially, “walk in love, just as Christ also loved you and gave Himself up for us, an offering and a sacrifice to God” (Ephesians 5:2, NASB). The world says “me first,” but the Bible tells us to put others first, “Do nothing from selfishness or empty conceit, but with humility of mind regard one another as more important than yourselves” (Philippians 2:3, NASB). The world says, “It’s not my fault,” “I’m the victim,” but the Bible teaches that we are to take responsibility for our actions, “For each one will bear his own load” (Galatians 6:5, NASB). The world wants us to tell it to Dr. Phil and Oprah, but the Bible says that a Christian should, “Let no unwholesome word proceed from your mouth, but only such a word as is good for edification according to the need of the moment, so that it will give grace to those who hear” (Ephesians 4:29, NASB).






Works Cited
All Scripture is from the New American Standard Bible (NASB)
Copyright © 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995 by The Lockman Foundation
Adams, J. E. (1976). What About Nouthetic Counseling? Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House.

Census, U. S. (2000). America's Families and Living Arrangements. Current Population Report.

Cloud, H., & Townsend, J. (2006). 21 Days to a Great Marriage. Franklin, Tennessee: Integrity Publishers.
Dobson, J. (1973). Dare to Discipline (11th ed.). Wheaton, Illinois: Tyndale House Publishers.

Dobson, J. (2004). Marriage Under Fire. Sisters, Oregon: Multnomah Publishers, INC.

Grudem, W. (2002). Biblical Foundations for Manhood and Womanhood. Wheaton, Illinois: Crossway Books.

Johnson, E. L. (2010). Psychology and Christianity: Five Views (2nd Edition ed.). (E. L. Johnson, Ed.) Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press.

McGee, J. V. (n.d.). Thu The Bible Radio MP3 Archives. Retrieved October 11, 2011, from Truth e-Bible: http://thruthebible.ca/

Myers, D. a. (2003). Psychology Through The Eyes Of Faith. New York: Harper Collins.

Roberts, S. (2006, October 15). "It's Official: To Be Married Means To Be Out Numbered". New York Times , p. 22.

Schaeffer, F. A. (1972). Genesis in Space and Time. Downers Grove, Illinois: InterVarsity Press.






T








Sunday, October 30, 2011

Question From Vicki

How can you use confrontation therapy effectively in your therapy session to get the client to make his or her own decision?
Vicki,
Confrontation alone will more than likely backfire on a therapist. However, one thing I like to do is to incorporate the confrontation into a question style format. If there is a need to confront, it usually means that someone doesn’t understand or doesn’t want to understand the consequences of their behavior. So, I believe formulating questions or statements that somewhat lead the client to see (understand their situation) better. I do this a lot with people who make ridiculous statements about Christianity that are illogical. The Bible is not only for edification, but also reproof (2 Tim. 3:16). When confronting relativism, which is a self-defeating position (a statement that fails its own standard), I might say something like this, “To say there are no absolute truths is itself an absolute truth statement.” Therefore, to say, “There is no truth,” is a statement of truth. I know this is not necessarily a question, but it is confrontational and should illicit deeper thought from the person who hears it.

Thanks for your question

Question From Rhonda

Which do you think the client benefits more from...shaping the process or controlling the process?

Rhonda,

I believe that the counselor needs to be genuine and build a relationship with the client versus being somewhat removed and uninvolved. The counselor needs to be inside the process, and not an outsider applying some form of premeditated conditioning (shaping/controlling). I believe the most effective reinforcements are real concern, real interest, and real understanding. Being a counselor, in my opinion, is more than handing out rewards (like a vending machine), smiling, and affirming. I would sum it up this way; real growth comes from real understanding on the part of both parties.

Thanks for your question

Sunday, October 16, 2011

Crossing Borders: The Realities of Adoption

I used love the old gangster movies such as “The Godfather,” “Public Enemy,” and “Key Largo.” Even today I am still intrigued by the newer releases as well. The hook for me was the cultural aspect of Italian life that was portrayed in these films. Much like the poem “Mafioso” (Gilbert 1283 I-J) the characterization of the people, as an ethnic group, was and still is that of ideas based on few people and applied to the entire ethnic group without regard for the truth. Bringing this argument in terms that are more relevant to the immigrants coming to America in our generation I will adjust the focus from the Italians of yesterday to the Hispanic immigration of today. Just as the Italians were often portrayed as people they were not, today those stereotypical mindsets are just as strong and just as wrong when applied to an entire people group. Examining the areas of border control, assimilation, jobs, and economic impact will verify the fact that majority Hispanic immigrants are more than people, who sneak across borders, take all the lawn care and construction grunt-work jobs, and nurse from the federal government social programs without contributing anything in return.

Before embarking on the journey there needs to be some basic understanding of a key term. A “stereotype” is a generalization about a person or group of people. Generalizations are developed when we are unable or unwilling to obtain all of the information we would need to make fair judgments about people of situations. Fear of people or ethnic groups is also a major source of stereotypes. Are all Hispanic people illegal immigrants? Are we afraid “those people” are taking over America?

One of the most common stereotypes heard today about Hispanic immigrants is that they are cheap labor and as a result keep wages low for the rest of the workforce. As with most stereotypical comments made about illegal immigrants this one makes a good backdrop against which to measure reality. The New York Times reported the following in regard to illegal immigrants: “In many cases, the jobs held by illegal immigrants are far from the minimum- orsubminimumwage stereotype, as well. Though the work itself is often unpleasant, the pay ratesare commonly in the range of $10 to $20 an hour.” (Altman 2) The impact of Altman’s statement is the way he compares the type of work with the pay range. Based on his assessment we can draw the conclusion that without the immigrant workers the jobs might not be filled. The wage effect in the field of agriculture, being the most common area of employment for immigrants, might be the best example as the effects are summed up in this statement, “My belief is the impact of immigration on Georgia farm workers and farm wage rates is virtually zero. The reason is the shortage of local workers for farm-related jobs at any affordable wage rate.”

(Black 15) Who would perform these tasks if the flow of immigrants legal or illegal were stopped? Although I do not consider any work below me, nevertheless I do not envision myself doing some of the jobs immigrants are risking their lives to come to America for such as “painting, washing cars, packaging by hand, and installation of carpets and floors.” (Altman 1)

With first hand experience as my teacher I can testify to the work ethic and motives of a large portion of those immigrating to the United States. As a young man I witnessed men who came to this country, some legal and some not so legal, that worked for my father’s company as concrete laborers. One event that really stood out to me was the day we approached a small one-bedroom house. I remember my dad saying we were picking up eight to ten men and taking them to work at the plant. As we approached, some of the men came out. Then one man motioned for my dad to come to the door, and being in unfamiliar territory, I went with him. As the man informed us that one of the other men was not feeling well, I looked inside, and what I saw is still etched in my mind today. I saw clothing hanging on nails in the walls that were spaced out in sections as if to say, “This is my individual space,” “this is my home, where I live.” My father later told me that these men risked lives, left families, and came into what might be perceived as hostile territory to make a better life for themselves and their families. Every Friday afternoon these men took their checks to the Western Union office and sent just about every penny back home to their families. Not only were these men reliable workers, but also they proved to me that the stereotype of these immigrants devaluing the workforce is not reality.

Like those men, the vast majority of immigrants come to America in order to build a better life. Contrary to the belief that immigrants are just here to take jobs and send money home, these men were working to bring their families to America as well. But what then? What happens when the entire family arrives? Do they assimilate into the American culture. Common stereotypes would have us believe that immigrants want to hold to cultures of their countries of origin. If you saw the march on April 10, 2006, in Dallas, Texas, you might think those stereotypes hold true. As the people marched in the streets, they were often interviewed, and had absolutely no idea what the march was actually about. The story of those who did understand could be seen in the flags that were carried and the quotation on one group’s banner as reported by the The Dallas Morning News, “Some carried large U.S. flags; another group had a 5-foot banner reading ‘Legalización. It's our American dream too’.” (Ayres 1) The size of a flag in a march or parade is seldom emphasized in a report. To describe the flag as being large puts an emphasis on the patriotic aspect of the mindsets of those marching. They dream of freedom. We, as native citizens, too often take the dream for granted. Many times we want to horde the dream for ourselves like children in a game of keep-a-way. We want the best for our families, but based on the stereotypes we harbor, we have a tendency to rail against those trying to achieve the same freedom and opportunity. These immigrants also believe “that learning to speak English is key to leading a successful life in the U.S.” (Remaley 2) We Should pay special attention to the people we come in contact with on a daily basis and think about the broken English a lot of these people speak. Imagine that we immigrated to a new country. How quickly would we pick up the language? Could we do it without a formal education? I have tried to learn my family’s native language and I can confirm that I am glad I do not have to live full time, let alone work, in the country my family came from. It is amazing that people come to this country without the ability to communicate effectively to find jobs and a new life. The sheer magnitude alone seems overwhelming. The numbers that confirm speaking English as essential are also impressive as “73% say that it’s extremely important (to speak English well) for immigrants ‘to work and stay off welfare.” (Remaley 1) Then they go on to state “(88 percent) immigrants say the U.S. is better than their own country when it comes to having more opportunity to earn a good living.” (Remaley 1) Earning a good living is a goal most of us share. If you cannot earn a living where you are, what do you do? Do you migrate? Do you move to a new city or a new state or maybe you have to leave your homeland and go to a place so different you might as well have landed on Mars? Moving to a new place doesn’t automatically mean you will assimilate to the culture, but for the majority who do it can sometimes be ironic. How about immigrating from Mexico, and after getting a good education, you go to work in a new job keeping people just like you from entering the country in which you now live? That happens more often than most might imagine “many of those who keep watch over our borders each day are, in fact, Mexican-American.” (Miniter 1) Over fifty percent of the agents working for the U.S. Border Control are Hispanic. The numbers are interesting “at least 6,700 of the country's 12,800 Border Patrol agents identify themselves as Hispanic.” (Miniter 1) Immigrants guarding the U.S. border are a very real picture of assimilation. Even with these statistics a large number of Americans continue to believe that “Latino immigrants keep to themselves and don't try to fit in." (Miniter 1) Fitting into a society means many things to many people. One of the most contentious centers around their usage of social services and not contributing back into the system. Ignorance of federal laws feeds that stereotype. The law states “Immigrants who enter legally through regular quotas are not permitted to receive public assistance for three years, and they may be deported if they obtain such assistance.” (Simon 1) Therefore the U.S. has a system in place to protect social programs such as welfare. As an example, currently only “About 13 percent (or 546,000) of the Nation’s 4.2 million foreign-born mothers aged 15 to 44 were on food stamps, compared to 15 percent of (or 4.8 million) U.S.-born mothers.” (Bernstein 2) The questions should build up quickly when we read these statistics. The stereotype of immigrants, illegal or not, using an exaggerated percentage of welfare does not pass this test.

Passing tests seems to be a soft spot in the stereotyping argument. The overall educational pattern for immigrants seems to improve with each generation born in the U.S. The fact that education assimilation seems to get better across generations is a positive step to the success of immigrants in the long run. Statistics show “High school dropout rates for immigrants improve across generations, dropping from 27 percent in the first generation to 8.6 percent in the third generation.” (Orrenius 2) When compared to the national dropout average “7.9 percent for white students, compared to 13.6 percent for black students,” (Hollinger 2) the immigrant rate appears to be virtually right in line with native ethnic averages. It would be hard to justify a claim of immigrants being poorly educated based on these numbers. Education is the key to future success. Studies have shown that income over a lifetime is higher in proportion to the level of education a person attains. The deduction can be made that over time, and with each generation, the standard of living for immigrants and the families that result over the years will increase. With that increase, and the evidence for assimilation of those families, immigrants should prove to be an asset to the U.S. The education process, I believe, is the key for immigrants.

In light of the rapidly, ever-changing, economy and education world that we live in we have seen an astounding growth rate for service and technology oriented jobs. With the job market evolving we are seeing more and more medium to low-skilled jobs going to the countries of origin of many of the immigrants that are trying to reach the U.S. Companies call this outsourcing. I call it a headache if I need assistance with one of my six expensive Dell computer systems. Unlike their counterparts that have come to the U.S., those that answer the phones for companies such as Dell only have to be familiar enough with the language, people, products, and attitudes to make someone angry enough to just hang up and figure it on their own. That almost sounds like a stereotype, but it is not. Having dealt with several companies who “outsource” I have had virtually the same experience on each occasion. Immigrants don’t have the choice, in most cases, to communicate only on topics in which they are supposed to be trained. The immigrants that come to the U.S. must deal with employers, legal or not, they have to find housing; they have to buy food, and negotiate all kinds of daily transactions that would petrify most people. (Please remember that speaking louder does not translate English to any other language. My sixteen year old daughter has a close friend whose parents are immigrants from the Philippines. They are very well educated, wonderful people to know. It always amazes me when people engage in shouting with hopes of clarifying their words. The humorous thing is that they understand completely every word spoken to them.) But being able to communicate successfully, not just to buy food and clothes, will be the next frontier for immigrants. Service and technology jobs require, at minimum, good communication skills and more in-depth education. Whereas medium to low-skilled jobs mainly require physical ability, and if you can get to work you can get paid. This might be a place to stop and pause for concern “The Center for Continuing Study of the California Economy figures that from now (1988) until 1995, the state economy will be increasingly technological, but that Hispanics, Asians, and blacks will not be holding the higher-skilled jobs in proportion to their population.” (McConnell 4) This older study announced doom and gloom for immigrants and minorities. Since that time Asians and Hispanics have become a very significant portion of all immigrants. The interesting outcome was something no one thought about, “Many immigrants have become entrepreneurs, creating jobs for other Immigrants and natives. Immigrant entrepreneurs may be particularly likely to develop export opportunities for American products given their connections abroad and language skills.” (Krueger 1) Once again the biased mindset was thwarted. The stereotype of immigrants not being able to move into high-skilled jobs was worked over by the innovative entrepreneurial skills of those same immigrants.

As I look at the picture entitled “Baggage Examined Here” I am painfully reminded of how far society has come, but also how far society has not come. The immigrant boys in the picture, under the sign that reads “Baggage Examined Here,” look like cheap labor. There are no parents in the scene, and maybe they are on their own. How will they assimilate in their new homeland? The picture gives no clue where they are from. Can they understand the language, and do they even know what is going on around them. When they are finished being processed where will they go? Will they go to school or go to work? What thoughts must have been going through their heads? Immigrants come to this country everyday from all over the world to have a small part of our dream. That dream is ours only if we take hold of it and share it with others. It is often forgotten that every one of us, with the exception of Native American Indians, are descendants of people who left behind their respective homelands and were adopted by this great country, America.

Works Cited

ALTMAN, DANIEL . "Shattering Stereotypes About Immigrant Workers ". New York Times. 03/20/2008 .

Ayers, Karen. "'No Turning Back'". Dallas Morning News. March 18, 2008 .

Bernstein, Robert . "Mothers Who Receive Food Stamps". U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division . March 20, 2008 .

Black, Gary. "Statement of Gary Black, President, Georgia Agribusiness Council". Immigration: Economic Impact on American Workers and Their Wages Field Hearing. Washington: U.S, Government, 2006.

Gilbert, Sandra M. “Mafioso.” The Bedford Introduction To Literature 8th Edition. Boston: Bedford/St.Martin's, 2008. 1283 I-J.

Hollinger, Debra. "High School Dropout Rates". U.S. Deptartment of Education Consumer Guide. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research, 1996.

Krueger, Alan. "Immigrants, Jobs & The Labor Force". Princeton University Economics Dept.. March 25, 2008 .

McConnell, Scott. "The New Battle Over Immigration". FORTUNE Magazine. March 25, 2008 .

Meyers, Michael. “Baggage Examined Here.” The Bedford Introduction To Literature 8th Edition. Boston: Bedford/St.Martin's, 2008. 1283 I.

Miniter, Paulette Chu . "A border agent (and immigrant) defies stereotypes". USA Today. 03/20/2008 .

Orrenius, Pia. "Immigrant Assimilation: Is the U.S. still a melting pot?". Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. March 19, 2008 .

Remaley, Michael. "Immigrants Dispel Negative Stereotypes." Public Agenda. 14/01/2003. Carnegie Corporation. 28 Mar 2008 .

Simon, Julian. "Immigration: The Demographic and Economic Facts." Cato Institute . 11/12/1995. Cato Institute and the National Immigration Forum. 19 Mar 2008 .

U. S. Government, "Estimates of the Unauthorized Immigrant Population Residing in the United States". Immigration and Naturalization Service. March 20, 2008 .