We are, to some extent, rational
beings in that we will try to logically understand things and make sensible
choices.
However, the world is large and
complex, and we do not have the capacity to understand everything. We also have
a limited time in which to make decisions. We are also limited by the schemas
we have and other decisional limitations.
Harder problems require more thinking,
increasing the cognitive load. If there is too much to think about this causes
cognitive overload as we try to cope.
As a result, many of our decisions
are not fully thought through and we can only be rational within the limits of
time and cognitive capability. Herbert Simon indicated that there were thus two
major causes of bounded rationality:
- Limitations of the human mind
- The structure within which the mind operates
This impacts decision models that
assume us to be fully rational.
For example, when calculating
expected value, it may be curious to find that people do not make the best
choices.
When I go to buy a new
home entertainment system based on reading a few web reviews and having
conversations with several friends, the transaction is often a “done deal”
before I enter the store no matter if the sales person offers me a better
bargain, I still turn it down.
SO WHAT NOW?
Either play
within the bounds of rationality by giving the other person few choices and
limited criteria, or break their existing bounds by showing how these are
ineffective (then help them set up cognitive camp elsewhere).
BOTTOM LINE:
When you make a decision, pause to
reflect whether what seems rational is adequate. As necessary, test your
decision with other people. Do not be hurried into a decision by others.
TJ
No comments:
Post a Comment