Orientation to Culture / Diversity

The topic of diversity is a is an extraordinarily tough topic to address. The fact that Choudhuri (2012) uses the "fourth force" descriptive does not add much to the validity of her writing. If this sounds harsh, it is not intended to be harsh, but personal convictions about the destructive power of multiculturalism may lend to the perception of harshness. 

Counseling from a Biblical perspective should be something that tends to be a bit more narrow in focus, but should never be narrow-minded. Acknowledging cultural differences must be integrated into the counselor-client relationship. It would seem quite foolish to assume that everyone, regardless of ethnicity, race, country of origin, socioeconomic background, or just about any variable, to respond to a one-size-fits-all counseling approach. 

Counseling, with in the cultural context, requires a counselor to adapt certain approaches to therapy to fit the client. Cultural background should play a role in the decision-making of the counselor. However, what does seem somewhat unusual is to require a counselor to share a cultural heritage with a client. The previous statement may sound strange, but that seems to be thought process, although not necessarily stated as such, of the emic approach to counseling those of different cultures. Choudhuri (2012) explains the emic approach as one that requires a counselor to adapt the approach they use to the client, and if they cannot adapt they should create a new way to counsel the culturally specific client. On its face this sounds like a grand plan, but there seem to be some underlying assumptions connected to the emic approach. 

This approach could arguably be implying that a counselor is not equipped, using their tested methods, to counsel someone from a different culture because they, the counselor, are not from that particular background. Does this approach produce unity among differing groups, or does this approach add to the division that can, and does, exist between those from differing cultures? 

It would seem that an etic approach would be more reasonable when counseling those from differing cultures. The etic approach seems, on its face, to be compatible with a Biblical approach. The Biblical approach seems to work best when common ground (principles) can be found upon which to build a trusting and mutually helpful relationship. The Biblical approach is exemplified so well in the Book of Acts when the Apostle Paul goes to  Athens to proclaim God on Mars Hill. At Mars Hill he did not change his method or approach, but instead Paul found common ground with those he sought to win over. Paul, like any responsible counselor might, started with common ground and insight into their culture. He did not remain there though. He moved on to share the truth with those who were listening, "The God who made the world and all things in it, since He is Lord of heaven and earth, does not dwell in temples made with hands; nor is He served by human hands, as though He needed anything, since He Himself gives to all people life and breath and all things" (Acts 17:24-25, NASB). He may have started with cultural relevance, but he turned quickly to transcendent truth. This truth was foreign to the Athenian culture, but God can, and still does speak to people of every culture in the same manner.

References

Choudhuri, D., Santiago-Rivera, A., & Garrett, M. (2012). Counseling and diversity. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.

New American Standard Bible (NASB) Copyright © 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973 1975, 1977, 1995 by The Lockman Foundation.

 

TJ