Showing posts with label strategy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label strategy. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 22, 2017

Create a Climate for Change

 
To create a climate for change a leader needs to do several things, but the first thing they must do is to inspire the organization through the sharing of his vision (Kaplan & Norton, 2001).
 
 I believe that people are much more inclined to follow an idea much more quickly than a set of objectives. However, I have found that when a leader shares a compelling vision, it is amazing how those who follow buy into the processes that make up the strategy to carry out the vision.
Following my own method of empowering people to carry out the organizational strategy, the decentralization of power (Kaplan & Norton, 2001), with the right process measurements, can create a climate conducive to change. 
 
A big key to creating and maintaining change is when the leadership paints a vivid picture of a preferable future, and does so respecting the value systems of those within the organization.
The setting of goals that almost seem unreachable tends to help keep people focused on the “Big Picture” to maintain the change climate (Kaplan & Norton, 2001). 
 
Refusal to buy into strategies that are meant to align organizations could be the primary obstacle to actually achieving alignment. The refusal to buy in is often a symptom of poor communication between executive level people and those they lead. Even if the communication is good, not employing an adequate implementation strategy of measurement system can create road-blocks to successful alignment (Kaplan & Norton, 2006) and (Kaplan & Norton, 2001).  Measurements used when trying to implement change should focus on the process (how things are progressing) and not so much on outcomes (Kaplan & Norton, 2006) because in order to change there can be a need to make changes to the change strategy. Other obstacles could include poor leadership, uninspiring leadership, untrustworthy leadership, and many other negative aspects the leader might exhibit.
If a leader is suspect (not trustworthy, not likable, not whatever), but their vision is compelling, would you follow them?
 
Do you accept good ideas from people you really do not like?
 
Have you ever followed someone blindly and were pleased with the outcome?
 
Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (2006). Alignment. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (2001). The Strategy-Focused Organization. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
 
TJ

Monday, January 20, 2014

The Myth of UnCreativity




There is a myth about creativity that it is all about genius and talent. Certainly, there is no smoke without fire, and some people do have a particular bent for it, but the reality is that we all have far more capability to be creative than we realize.
When we were children, we were more creative than our parents and teachers could handle. We thus learned not to be creative, and most of our lessons were structured and controlled, and the lessons were so effective for many of us, we were left with the belief that we were never creative and could never be creative.
The patterns of non-creativity often carry on as we grow older and we get stuck in habits and 'I am not creative' goes from being an excuse to a description the mental ruts into which we fall.

Learning to think
Just as we can learn to swim, so also can we learn to think. People such as Edward de Bono have put significant effort into teaching thinking as an acquired skill. Socrates did it many years ago. He would answer a question with another question, forcing his disciples, including Plato and Aristotle, to think for themselves.
A simple way you can do this is to buy puzzle books, especially those that include tricky and lateral thinking games. Crosswords are another mind-bender that can help you climb out of your rut. You can also vary the method – working on jigsaw puzzles, for example, helps your visualization.
Another variant is to sign up for a class where you will have to think outside your normal patterns of thought. If you are a scientist, take an arts class. If you are an artist, study philosophy. You can also do these in your spare time. Books cost pennies and contain gold dust and gems.

Learning by doing
The army uses a term: 'muscle memory'. When you go on a long march, your muscles seem to remember how to march a long way and months later a similar march is nowhere near as hard. The same is true with creativity. Once you have opened the gates and got stuck into some really hard creative work (it is a myth that it is all fun and easy).
Get engaged in any creative activity you can. Offer yourself as an out-of-the-box thinker for other people's brainstorming sessions. Paint, sculpt or take photographs. Climb mountains and shout from the hilltops.
Do things to break your own paradigms. Wear different clothes. Get a different haircut. Enter for creative competitions. Read things you wouldn't normally read. Step outside the box and push the boundaries to expand your comfort zone.

Practice, practice
The secret is to keep on going with as many different things as your brain can take. Go on different holidays. Take up different hobbies. Drive to work by different routes.
Build yourself a regular schedule of practicing creativity. Just like going to the gym, spend quality time in practice. Plan the activities and exercises you will do, as well as the ways you will use it to enhance your life.
Many people have found simple, but valuable ideas that they have turned into profitable businesses. Do you think you could not do that? What is stopping you?
Keep generating ideas. Look around you for problems to solve. There are many opportunities all around you, right now. Look at the issues you and others are facing. Look at the little difficulties, from unscrewing a tight lid in the kitchen to lifting heavy items out of the car.
Practice may not make perfect, but it will make you a whole lot better at creativity.

T
“Inter caecos regnat strabo”
Among blind people the squinting one rules.
*

Wednesday, July 4, 2012

How can managers monitor the appropriateness of a strategy over time?



The most important way, in my opinion, is making sure that the goals are in harmony with what the organization is doing on all levels. Do their goals match their policies (financial, employee, vendor). Second in importance might be making sure the ongoing level of risk is appropriate, and do not over-commit or under-commit resources by finding the needed ROI. Third, the strategy needs to be flexible. For example, when a church puts into writing their by-laws, employee manuals, constitution, or whatever they have to keep the future in mind. So many organizations set up these documents in reaction to past issues. While I understand the reasoning, I absolutely believe that it is wrong. You cannot build an organization for the future while looking back. Ever tried driving your car using only the rear-view mirror? Driving this way seems kind of goofy. Churches are not alone, but they are my wheel-house, and they make the same mistakes other organizations make.